Sir, – I refer to “The Irish Times view on the Leaving Cert: reform cannot come soon enough” (August 22nd).
Your editorial justification for reform is built in part upon vague statements, such as: “Tech-savvy teenagers, used to choice and independence, too often sit passively.”
This sort of hazy justification for reform is dangerous. The Junior Cycle was partly introduced using this sort of “evidence”. It led to the promotion of a top-down, rigid educational orthodoxy. This in turn led to the introduction of time and resource-wasteful CBAs (classroom-based assessments, also now known by many as “Couldn’t Be Ar***”), dumbed-down syllabuses, the disastrously stupid decision to drop history (reversed) and geography (still in place) as core subjects, and the incredibly costly belief that teachers needed to be told how to teach.
Call for Leaving Cert reform, if you must, but at least be clear why, as otherwise you run the risk of implementing prodigal, and at times ridiculous, changes. – Yours, etc,
Totò Schillaci’s joy was infectious and he was loved in Ireland, despite that goal
‘I’m trying to build a social life, but how can I when my parents call to see me all the time?’
Test drive: the Peugeot E-3008 electric SUV-coupe is a long-range surprise
Barry Andrews: Ignore the negativity. Michael McGrath’s new job is a win for Ireland
SEAN KEAVNEY,
Castleknock,
Dublin 15.