Media

Broadcaster Paul Byrne leaving Virgin Media after resolving High Court case

Dispute over internal disciplinary proceedings has been settled following mediation

Paul Byrne had broadcast information he believed to be true but which turned out to be false during a report on a young boy's death.
Paul Byrne had broadcast information he believed to be true but which turned out to be false during a report on a young boy's death.
Aodhan O'Faolain
Tue Jun 04 2024 - 17:56

Broadcaster Paul Byrne has announced that he is leaving Virgin Media News after resolving his High Court action against Virgin Media television over its decision to bring internal disciplinary proceedings against him.

Mr Byrne, who has worked as broadcaster’s southern correspondent for many years, had sued Virgin Media, seeking various injunctions over what he claimed was a flawed disciplinary process.

The claims were denied.

The matter was mentioned before Mr Justice Mark Sanfey on Tuesday, when the journalist’s senior counsel, Eoin Clifford, said that following mediation the dispute has been settled in its entirety. Counsel then asked the court to strike out the case.

READ SOME MORE

No further details of the settlement, which is understood to be confidential, were given in open court. Mr Byrne was not in court on Tuesday.

Mr Justice Sanfey welcomed the resolution of the case.

In an announcement on social media platform X after the court hearing, Mr Byrne said the “time has come for me to move on” after 26 years with the broadcaster.

The court previously heard that Mr Byrne was suspended from his role following a live report he made on the afternoon of February 9th last concerning the death of a young boy in Co Waterford.

Mr Byrne, the court heard, had stated in a report that one line of inquiry being considered by gardaí as part of the investigation into the child’s death was that the boy had allegedly been drowned and placed into a car.

The claim was broadcast after Mr Byrne checked it with at least two credible sources, and after two other media outlets had published the same information.

While he had believed the information to be credible, the information later turned out not to be true. Shortly afterwards he claims his employer suspended him for allegedly breaching the broadcaster’s News Guidelines and Production Handbook, because he had failed to speak to his line manager about the matter in advance of the broadcast.

He claimed the disciplinary process could have resulted in his dismissal for alleged gross misconduct. He denied any wrongdoing, and claimed that the process was flawed, punitive, disproportionate and should be set aside. He also claimed that the process lacked credibility, and breached his contractual rights.

As a result he commenced proceedings before the High Court last April seeking an injunction restraining Virgin Media Ireland Ltd, and Virgin Media Television Limited from continuing the disciplinary process against him, and that his suspension be lifted.

In correspondence the defendants rejected Mr Byrne’s claims against both them and the disciplinary process itself. They said that given Virgin Media’s role as a public broadcaster the alleged breach was deemed “serious in nature” and informed him that “steps needed to be taken to avoid a repeat”.