US president Donald Trump has cast doubt on his willingness to defend Washington’s Nato allies, saying he would not do so if they are not paying enough for their own defence.
“It’s common sense, right,” Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “If they don’t pay, I’m not going to defend them. No, I’m not going to defend them.”
Mr Trump said he has been of this view for years and shared it with Nato allies during his 2017-2021 presidential term. Those efforts prompted more spending from other members of the 75-year-old transatlantic alliance, he said, but “even now, it’s not enough.”
He added: “They should be paying more.”
Israeli security services point finger at Netanyahu as they own up to errors over Hamas’s October 7th incursion
Turkey’s Erdogan makes risky bet on peace with Kurds
‘We’ll rest when we win’: No let-up for Ukraine’s medics and rescue teams as war with Russia grinds on
Trump-Starmer summit: British PM produces masterstroke of political theatre as he seeks to cement bromance
A mutual assistance clause lies at the heart of the Nato alliance, which was formed in 1949 with the primary aim of countering the risk of a Soviet attack on allied territory.
Mr Trump’s remarks could trigger alarm bells in capitals from Europe to Asia, where leaders were already worried about a withdrawal of US security support after Mr Trump clashed with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and showed greater willingness to deal with Russian president Vladimir Putin.
Earlier on Thursday, concerned European leaders backed plans to spend more on defence and pledged to continue to stand by Ukraine. “I know some may have concerns about Nato’s future,” Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said earlier on Thursday.
“So let me be clear, the transatlantic relationship and the transatlantic partnership remains the bedrock of our alliance. President [Donald] Trump has made clear the commitment of the US and his commitment personally to Nato, and it has also made clear the expectation that we in Europe must do more in terms of defence spending.”
In the Oval Office, Mr Trump said Nato members were friends of his but questioned whether France or a “couple of others” would protect the US in a moment of crisis.
“You think they’re going to come and protect us? They’re supposed to,” Mr Trump said. “I’m not so sure.”
[ Burning question for Europe now is how to deal with an elected American tyrantOpens in new window ]
Mr Trump said he viewed Nato as “potentially good” if what he saw as the spending issue could be fixed. “They’re screwing us on trade,” he said of the security alliance. Mr Trump had affirmed the US’ commitments to the mutual defence of Nato as recently as last week during a press conference alongside British prime minister Keir Starmer.
At a meeting of European leaders in Brussels, French president Emmanuel Macron responded to Mr Trump’s comments by saying France and other European countries had joined US troops in fighting in Afghanistan after 9/11.
“Not only the French, but the Europeans were there when we were called for Afghanistan. And by the way, they weren’t politely warned when (the US left Afghanistan),” Mr Macron said. “We are loyal and faithful allies.”
Mr Trump also mused on the US treaty alliance with Japan, which he affirmed in a joint statement with Tokyo last month as poised “to grow stronger than ever”.
The collective defence arrangement dates back to agreements made after the conclusion of hostilities during the second World War.
“We have a great relationship with Japan, but we have an interesting deal with Japan that we have to protect them, but they don’t have to protect us. You know that? That’s the way the deal reads,” Mr Trump said on Thursday.
“And by the way, they make a fortune with us economically... Who makes these deals?” The remarks echoed comments Mr Trump made during a 2019 visit to the country.
Japan’s embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Nicholas Szechenyi, a Japan expert at Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies, called Mr Trump’s remarks “technically inaccurate”.
While Japan’s post-second World War constitution long restricted its military activities, reforms have meant it could exercise collective self-defence and help protect the US under certain circumstances, Mr Szechenyi said.
Such circumstances included if an armed attack against a foreign state that is in a close relationship with Japan threatened Japan’s survival, he said. – Reuters
