Issues of parity arise at Wimbledon every year. It normally takes something like a 57 -minute match or better to kick-start the debate and more often than not number one seed Serena Williams is the perpetrator. Williams has honed her game to a series of numbers. If she can hit the numbers nobody will beat her.
Yesterday against Luxemburg's Mandy Minella she hit the numbers for most of the match, had a lull early in the second set and dropped her serve, then began to hit them again. Even for her first outing on Centre Court, tidying it all up in under an hour 6-1, 6-3 is indecently quick, although people forget Steffi Graf could occasionally turn out a double bagel (6-0,6-0) in under 30 minutes.
Baseline points
Williams's numbers were 86 per cent, 83 per cent, 86 per cent and 81 per cent. Approach points won, baseline points won, net points won and first serves in. Factor in in her total winners for the match at 25 and those metrics tell you it has to be a Williams victory. .
The prize fund this year for the entire tournament is £22,560,000 (€26,589,000). Of that £1,600,000 (€1.88 million) goes to the winners in both of the singles competitions. Women achieved equal prize money at Wimbledon in 2007 following years of lobbying.
Prior to that the men controversially received more for winning the singles' title. Ten years ago Roger Federer won his first Wimbledon championship for £575,000 (€677,000), while Serena earned £535,000 (€630,000) for her efforts the same year.
Yesterday the three sets compared to the men's five issue arose again, Serena's 57 minutes over two sets against Ivan Dodig and Philipp Kohlschreiber's 184 minutes five-set battle.
“I think one of the things about that argument, the reason I think it’s null, is because we have said we’re willing and ready,” countered Williams. “I think every female athlete is ready to play five sets. Actually, the tournaments have said, ‘No, we like you guys playing three sets.’ I don’t think it’s a fair argument at all.”
At last year's Ricoh British Open golf tournament winner Yani Tseng walked away with a first prize of €272,365 or around €200,000 less than the four women's semi-finalists at this years Wimbledon. There's good money in tennis at the top. Williams' attitude there is that you have to fight for what you get.
The pioneer
"I think women's tennis has been the pioneer for women's sports," she said. "And I believe one of the reasons is because of wonderful pioneers such as Billie Jean King, her sitting down 40 years ago and saying, 'look, especially to the US Open, we're not going to accept anything less than equal prize money here – what the men get'.' Eventually starting their own tour, going from there. It just takes great leaders to have such a wonderful sport . . . ."
So might Laura Robson thank Billie Jean. The 19-year-old left hander came through her first round match to maintain British interest. Robson, ranked 38th in the world defeated the 10th seed, Russian Maria Kirilenko. The Londoner won in straight sets 6-3, 6-4 in 78 minutes. Nobody on Court One thought it lacked entertainment or that Robson does not merit the €44,000 she gets even if she loses her second round match. In that the crowd were at one.
