The International Olympic Committee (IOC) will not pressure 2022 Winter Olympics hosts China over its human rights record because it is not in the governing body's remit to dictate to sovereign countries, IOC vice-president John Coates said on Wednesday.
Rights groups and US lawmakers have called on the IOC to postpone next year's Beijing Games and relocate the event unless China ends what the US deems ongoing genocide against Uyghurs and other Muslim minority groups.
Chinese authorities have been accused of facilitating forced labour by detaining around a million Uyghurs and other primarily Muslim minorities in camps since 2016. China denies wrongdoing, saying it has set up vocational training centres to combat extremism.
Coates said the IOC’s human rights remit only covered the “Olympic movement” and the national Olympic committees within it.
“The IOC does place a very high emphasis on human rights,” Coates said. “I know it’s a very important part of the fundamental principles of Olympism, the fundamental principles set out in the Olympic charter.
“But the IOC’s remit is to ensure that there is no human rights abuses in respect of the conduct of the Games within the national Olympic committees or within the Olympic movement.
“We have no ability to go into a country and tell them what to do. All we can do is to award the Olympics to a country, under conditions set out in a host contract . . . and then ensure they are followed.”
Humanitarian visas
Coates was asked why the IOC would intervene in Afghanistan, where the Games are not being held, but not take a stand in countries where they are.
The IOC said last month it had helped around 100 members of the “Olympic community” in Afghanistan to leave the country on humanitarian visas after the Taliban took control.
“The work the IOC is doing is to protect the Olympians and those involved in the Olympic moments, those who comprise the sports federation in Afghanistan,” he said. “That’s within our remit. The situations that you have referred to, the humanitarian ones in China, is not within our remit.”
