Special Report
A special report is content that is edited and produced by the special reports unit within The Irish Times Content Studio. It is supported by advertisers who may contribute to the report but do not have editorial control.

How the pension levy works against your savings pot

The Government levy on pension pots is set to get bigger before it falls back

Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton addressing the Irish Association of Pension Funds  Annual Benefits Conference 2013 in the National Convention Centre Photograph: Alan Betson/THE IRISH TIMES
Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton addressing the Irish Association of Pension Funds Annual Benefits Conference 2013 in the National Convention Centre Photograph: Alan Betson/THE IRISH TIMES

With only about half of the country’s workers currently in occupational pension schemes, any moves to disincentivise those who have signed up is clearly unwelcome. Last month’s budget did not help the cause of those promoting pensions.

For starters, the Government levy on pension pots is set to increase to 0.75 per cent from the start of next year. On a pension pot of €500,000, 0.75 per cent represents a tax charge of €3,750.

The levy, which took effect from 2011, was scheduled to be phased out at the end of next year but concern is growing as to whether it will become a longer term fixture given the decision to retain it at the lower level of 0.15 per cent for 2015. A look at the revenues it generates indicates why.

The levy raised €483 million for the Government last year, is scheduled to raise €534 million this year and a substantial €675 million next year.

READ SOME MORE

“The levy is set to take around €2 billion out of pension funds over a four-year period. Unlike other forms of taxation, this is a tax on your capital not on the interest that you have earned which is of concern,” says Jerry Moriarty, the chief executive of the Irish Association of Pension Funds.

In another change, from the start of next year, drawing a pension benefit of more than €2 million will result in a penal tax bill at the point of retirement. “A pension of up to €100,000 per annum will be permitted if it was fully accrued prior to 1 January 2014,” says Munro O’ Dwyer of PwC.

“But for defined-benefit pensions, which accrue fully in the period post 1 January 2014, a pension in excess of €54,054 per annum at age 50 would create a liability to excess taxation. But at age 70, a pension of up to €90,910 per annum would be allowed.”

For those with defined-contribution pension entitlements the calculation is far more straightforward: the limit is set at €2 million for benefits that result from a defined-contribution fund, and the exposure to any excess tax is determined based on the value of the pension fund that is accessed.

“Where the pension limits are breached, any excess will be subject to taxation at 41 per cent. This excess tax is payable at the point of retirement, and the balance of the pension benefit will then be subject to the standard statutory deductions – income tax, universal social charge and at certain ages PRSI. What has not changed . . . is that a clear tax inefficiency results where the pension limits are breached,” O Dwyer says.

“While significant, the changes really only affect a small minority of pensioners,” notes Frank Downey of brokers Invesco. “The really big issue is the substantial number of people – about 50 per cent – who are not members of any scheme at all.”


Mandatory schemes
Downey says there are likely to be moves in the years ahead to introduce mandatory pension schemes. The UK, for example, has adopted this approach, albeit with low contribution levels and with an opt-out option.

Fionán O’ Sullivan of IFG says greater incentives should be given to individuals to withdraw limited portions of their pension pot. Currently, withdrawals from pension schemes are limited to Additional Voluntary Contributions for a defined period (up to March 2016) and those are subject to tax at 41 per cent.

“Given the take-up levels of only about 50 per cent, greater incentives should be given so that people could save for specific purposes, such as college fees for their children or they access part of their fund if they faced short-term financial difficulty,” he says.

“It’s difficult to convince someone in the 20s of the need to fund their retirement in a scheme that will involve locking away their money for 40 years as they often have other more pressing financial needs. Some innovative thinking is required to push up participation levels significantly,” he says.

For those with the means and the discipline to save hard for long periods, the rewards of pension investment are substantial, however.

For starters, there’s the option to take a tax-free lump sum on retirement equivalent to one and a half times final salary or 25 per cent of the fund up to a maximum of €200,000.

The balance can then be invested in an approved retirement fund or can be used to purchase an annuity which provides a regular income.