Detention of David Miranda ‘proportionate’, court rules

Partner of journalist who reported Snowden leaks had items seized under anti-terrorism laws

David Miranda (right) is embraced by his partner, journalist Glenn Greenwald, on  his arrival at Rio de Janeiro’s International Airport in August. Photograph: Ricardo Moraes/Reuters.
David Miranda (right) is embraced by his partner, journalist Glenn Greenwald, on his arrival at Rio de Janeiro’s International Airport in August. Photograph: Ricardo Moraes/Reuters.

Britain's High Court has quashed a legal challenge against the detention under anti-terrorism laws of the partner of Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who brought leaks from former US spy agency contractor Edward Snowden to world attention.

David Miranda had appealed against his detention and nine-hour questioning under anti-terrorism legislation last August when he landed at London's Heathrow Airport en route from Berlin to Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.

British authorities seized items from Miranda which they said included electronic media containing 58,000 documents from the US National Security Agency, Mr Snowden's former employer, and from its British counterpart, Government Communications Headquarters.

The High Court ruled said that the detention of the partner of the ex-Guardian newspaper reporter was lawful.

READ SOME MORE

"In my judgment the Schedule 7 (of the Terrorism Act) stop was a proportionate measure in the circumstances," said Judge John Laws.

“Its objective was not only legitimate, but very pressing.”

The ruling also criticised Greenwald’s evidence that journalists share with government the responsibility to decide what should not be published to protect national security.

“Journalists have no such constitutional responsibility,” the ruling said.

“The journalist will have his own take or focus on what serves the public interest, for which he is not answerable to the public through Parliament.”

Mr Miranda’s lawyers said they had applied for permission to appeal against the decision and that journalists were now finding alternative ways to protect material when travelling through Britain.

“We look forward to the Court of Appeal considering the fundamentally important legal issues raised in our appeal in due course,” said Gwendolen Morgan.

“Whilst the courts consider our appeal, we understand that journalists are making alternative travel plans to safeguard their material, sources and confidential working systems when they have to travel via the UK.”

Reuters