The Iraqi military command has launched a campaign to re-enlist soldiers and officers who abandoned their units, a crucial step in its effort to rebuild an army that has been routed in battle after battle by Islamic State (IS, also known as Isis) jihadists.
Even as the government has continued to equip volunteers, the de facto amnesty for deserters is an acknowledgment that the army desperately needs experienced soldiers – even ones who ran – for a force sustaining heavy losses despite the US-led air strike campaign against IS.
Army officials at re-enlistment centres in Baghdad and in the northern Kurdistan region say they have seen some success in the effort. More than 6,000 soldiers and officers, including those sent home by their commanders as well as those who fled unilaterally, had registered at a military outpost here in Kurdistan, and more than 5,000 had signed up in Baghdad, officials said.
But the returning forces make up only a small part of what has been lost. In June, when IS fighters swept across northern Iraq from Syria, four Iraqi divisions disintegrated, accounting for about 30,000 troops, though it remains unclear how many were killed and how many retreated on their own or under orders. Some units abandoned their weapons and equipment to the advancing insurgents.
In an interview broadcast on Sunday, US president Barack Obama said the US had been surprised by the rapid advances of the IS fighters and had overestimated the ability and will of the Iraqi military to counter those attacks.
In the months since the initial advances, the jihadist victories have continued, further damaging the army’s reputation. One came last week near Ramadi, in Anbar province, where about 150 soldiers were forced to flee their posts after running out of ammunition. Even among those Iraqi soldiers who have answered the call to re-enlist, morale is low, and distrust between the rank- and-file and officers runs deep. Most of those interviewed said they were primarily joining because they badly needed the pay, not out of any sense of loyalty or desire to fight.
C
orruption and sectarianism
“We’re back for money; we’re poor,” said Faisal Kamal Qasim, a soldier who had been with the 2nd Division at a base in Mosul when IS fighters seized the city. “We don’t know what else to do.” Even before the militants’ offensive, rampant corruption and sectarianism had weakened the army. “Sunnis are pulling one way, Shiites are pulling the other, and when it breaks, nobody is taking responsibility,” said Capt Hemin Kanabi, who has been overseeing recruitment in Qushtapa. “There should be a change of some of the commanders. Otherwise the same failures will occur.”
Some who abandoned their units have chosen instead to join Shiite militias. While the militias have often worked alongside the army and have been critical to the fight, they are feared by many Sunnis, posing political problems for the government as it tries to persuade Sunnis to reject IS.
Gen Martin E Dempsey, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, told Congress this month that of the 50 Iraqi brigades the US military had assessed, 26 were deemed to be "reputable partners".
“They seem to have a certain cohesion and a commitment to the central government,” Dempsey said. The remainder, he said, had problems with “infiltration and leadership and sectarianism.” Still, even many of the stronger Iraqi units required training and re-equipping before they would be ready to mount a major counteroffensive against IS militants.
Beyond rebuilding the army, Iraqi commanders are wrestling with a dizzying array of challenges, including questions about the readiness of the other national armed services; the possible incorporation of Shiite and Sunni militias into the government forces; the relationship between the Kurdish peshmerga and the central government; and the plan to form national guard units.
"Nobody knows what's going to happen," said Anthony H Cordesman, a military expert at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "Nobody knows what's going to work." The Iraqi army's central command issued the call for re-enlistments by text message on September 12th, officials and soldiers said. Nobody is being asked to explain why they abandoned their units.
“We don’t ask such questions,” said Lieut
Col Hamid Suhail Ngeim, an official at the re-enlistment centre in Baghdad. Those who have registered in the north have been told to wait at home for instructions about when and where to report for duty. Some who have registered in the capital have already been assigned to units, Ngeim said. But not everyone who wants to sign up has been able to do so, officials and soldiers said. Since the militants swept into Iraq, travel has become increasingly difficult, even within regions under government control, and many soldiers and officers said they have been unable to reach the recruitment centres to re-enlist.
Harsh scrutiny
In Kurdistan the authorities have toughened their checkpoints at the border of the semiautonomous region and along its roads. Arabs are being subjected to unusually harsh scrutiny, owing to Kurdish fears of IS sympathisers and operatives among the Arab population.
During the first week of registration in Kurdistan this month, hundreds of Arabs trying to get to Qushtapa were prevented from passing through a checkpoint between Kirkuk and Irbil, officials and enlistees said. “It took me four days to get through,” said Raad Fawzi, who was standing in line at the recruitment centre on a recent morning. Meanwhile, several Arab soldiers and officers who have ended up in a refugee camp north of Irbil said they did not dare travel to the recruitment centre here for fear they would not be able to re-enter the city and return to the camp because of difficulties at checkpoints.
Mobile recruitment office
Officials said they had deployed a mobile recruitment office to try to reach personnel in Kurdistan who could not travel to Qushtapa. Among those who showed up at the Kurdistan centre on two recent mornings, some told dramatic stories of a military that had withered at the first hint of menace. Of more than a dozen people interviewed, only one said he had ever fired a bullet against IS militants.
“Just to think about those days, it’s a moment of death,” an Iraqi brigadier general said after registering at the recruitment centre along with former staff members. Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said his unit was routed when his superiors ignored his calls for air support.
Most of the soldiers said they retreated on orders from superiors. Others said there were never orders: their commanders simply vanished and, lacking leadership, the soldiers followed. “There was no Isis, there was no fighting,” recalled Ahmed Mohammad, who was a sergeant assigned to a unit at a base near Kirkuk. “Our commander said: ‘Leave your weapons and go home.’”
"I don't know how to describe the feeling when a commander is weak like that," he said. "Our leaders ran away," added Fawzi, a soldier who had been posted on Hamreen Mountain near Baiji in Salahuddin province. "We were feeling betrayed. We were feeling that the high commanders betrayed us and betrayed our country." – (New York Times service)