The family of a Donegal teenager murdered by loyalists is to receive undisclosed damages in a settlement reached over alleged security force collusion with the killers.
Henry Cunningham (16), who was from Carndonagh in Co Donegal, was shot dead in August 1973 after UVF gunmen ambushed his work van near Randalstown, Co Antrim in August 1973.
His brothers Robert and Herbert were also among the labourers of mixed religion travelling home together in the vehicle.
They sued the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) after it emerged that a weapon used in the killing had been stolen from an army barracks the previous year.
Trump claims US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites caused ‘monumental damage’
HSE apologises to teenager (17) for injection of wrong Covid vaccine with already-used needle
Leaving Cert holidays 2025: Pupils and parents on ‘hellish’ Albufeira, ‘crazy’ Zante and ‘cultural’ Berlin
Michael Gaine murder: Gardaí visit Michael Kelley’s ex-partner in Maine
At the High Court in Belfast today it was announced that the action has been settled on confidential terms.
The resolution includes an agreement to pay an undisclosed sum in damages without any admission of liability, according to the family’s lawyers.
Henry, a Protestant youth from a Presbyterian background, was returning home in the van when gunmen opened fire from a motorway bridge.
No one has ever been prosecuted for his murder.
[ Who killed Henry Cunningham?Opens in new window ]
In 2008 a report by the Historical Enquiries Team (HET) found that one of the guns used had been stolen from a UDR base in Lurgan, Co Armagh.
The victim’s brothers sued the MoD for alleged misfeasance in public office and negligence, both as survivors of the attack and on behalf of his estate.
They claimed military chiefs were aware that guns under their control were being lost or stolen but failed to take any action.
Papers lodged in the case further allege the MoD knew or suspected personnel from the Ulster Defence Regiment, a British Army unit, were involved in taking the weapons which could be used by loyalist terror groups.
Herbert Cunningham died last year, but the surviving brother Robert attended court for the settlement of the family’s 15-year legal battle.
His barrister, Brian Fee KC, confirmed in court that the confidential settlement had been reached.
Mr Justice McLaughlin, who previously represented the MoD before his judicial appointment, told the family he was pleased that they had been able to achieve a resolution.
Outside court, Robert Cunningham insisted the case was not taken to obtain a payout.
“This was never about the money, it was about achieving closure,” said the 73-year-old.
“I started this so long ago, but I can sit back now that I have finally seen it through.”
His solicitors Kevin Winters and Gary Duffy of KRW Law said he had “defiantly” fought on to reach the outcome.
“Whilst disappointing that he didn’t get an apology, it is nevertheless important to emphasise the significance of today’s High Court resolution,” Mr Winters stated.
“I am immensely pleased for him that he’s got some long overdue closure now.”
Mr Duffy also highlighted how investigative research by human rights group, the Pat Finucane Centre, led to the discovery of an internal military assessment about the suspected collusion in the armoury theft.
“This extraordinary concession was never meant to see the light of day because without this revelation the case may have struggled to get off the ground,” Mr Duffy said.
Pat Finucane Centre director Paul O’Connor praised the Cunningham family’s tenacity and determination.
He claimed that the authorities “were well aware of the widespread infiltration of the UDR by loyalists when these weapons were stolen but turned a blind eye – and innocent civilians like Henry died.”
