The High Court has refused to allow a man to continue with his challenge to regulations that enable expedited development of accommodation for asylum seekers and displaced Ukrainians.
Mr Justice Richard Humphreys said Patrick McGreal’s case had a “potentially arguable point” but it was “abstractly premised” and lacked the necessary factual engagement to be allowed to continue.
The judge recommended that Mr McGreal, who was not represented by a legal team, should in any potential future case “err on the side of leaving out the accusations of crime, fraud and perjury” as such allegations tend not to help the court in this context.
The regulations, introduced last year by Minister for Housing Darragh O’Brien, allow the Minister for Integration to sanction a planning permission exemption for the temporary use of buildings or sites to house displaced people and those seeking international protection.
High levels of air pollutants that can cause respiratory, heart and brain issues found in Dublin hotspots
Leo Varadkar is right: basic maths should not flummox a minister or any of us
Dublin hotel bar manager accused of ‘defrauding customers’ by adding 10% service charge to bills
Soc Dems suspend Eoin Hayes for giving incorrect information about sale of shares from firm linked to Israeli military
Mr McGreal, from Co Westmeath, wanted the court to put a stop to their use and to grant an injunction preventing international protection applicants and displaced people from being housed in accommodation that is “not within the scope of the provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2000″.
Among his claims was that the regulations do not explicitly address an alleged requirement for proper planning of essential community infrastructure.
Mr McGreal previously and unsuccessfully sought an injunction to halt a proposal to house asylum seekers at a hotel in the village of Dundrum, Co Tipperary. This application was made in a separate court case.
The sole respondent in the case concerning the 2023 regulations, the Minister for Housing, issued a motion asking the court to overturn a judge’s earlier order permitting Mr McGreal to proceed with his regulations challenge. The Minister claimed the case disclosed no reasonable cause of action against him and was “frivolous, vexatious and bound to fail”.
Mr Justice Humphreys found various “fixable” flaws in Mr McGreal’s legal documents. However, he said insuperable hurdles included his lack of standing to bring the case, the “abstract nature of the challenge” and his timing.
The judge said an applicant “can’t simply wander into court to challenge measures of general application in isolation”. Laws enacted many years ago can, he said, be legally challenged, but such cases must concern “some new fact situation” rather than being based on “maybe this Act you have just looked up is unconstitutional”.
He did not agree with Mr McGreal that standing to challenge the regulations could be derived simply from being a citizen of Ireland or committed to democratic values.
Mr Justice Humphreys said Mr McGreal had a “potentially arguable point” about the reasonableness of the conclusion that the effects of temporary asylum seeker housing was limited so as to warrant exemption from planning permission requirements.
However, he said various issues with his case could not be overcome. The judge overturned his colleague’s earlier grant of “leave”, which had allowed Mr McGreal’s case to proceed. He held that each side should be responsible for their own legal costs and expenses.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis
