Insurers refusing to indemnify €1.65bn worth of airplanes stuck in Russia, court hears

SMBC Aviation Capital wants court to determine meaning and effect of ‘war risks’ and ‘all risks’ policies

An Aeroflot aircraft taxis at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo international airport. Three aircraft leasing firms are suing 11 insurers over planes detained in Russia. Photograph: Getty Images
An Aeroflot aircraft taxis at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo international airport. Three aircraft leasing firms are suing 11 insurers over planes detained in Russia. Photograph: Getty Images

Three Dublin-registered companies involved in international aircraft leasing have brought High Court proceedings against insurers’ refusal to provide indemnity for the loss of some $1.75 billion (€1.65 billion) worth of airplanes detained in Russia following its invasion of Ukraine.

SMBC Aviation Capital Ltd, Global Aviation Ltd, and Wilmington Trust SP Services (Dublin) Ltd are suing 11 international insurers for declining to cover losses under either “all risks” or “war risks” policies. The insurers include Lloyds, Swiss Re International SE, Chubb European Group SE, Global Aerospace Underwriting Managers (Europe) SAS and AIG Europe SA.

The firms say the aircraft have an aggregate value of US$1.75 billion and, under the war risks policy, there is a liability limit of US$1 billion.

They say that when the Russians invaded Ukraine on February 24th, the aircraft were subject to aircraft lease agreements between one or other of the three firms and Russian airlines.

READ SOME MORE

Following the imposition of EU sanctions on Russia, the firms sought the return of the aircraft but it has not been possible to recover them.

When they called on the insurers to confirm cover for the aircraft, the defendants declined to do so, they claim. Lloyds, in its capacity as the “war risks” insurer, said it would not confirm indemnity at that time and needed additional time to consider coverage.

What will the easing of bankers’ pay restrictions do for competition dynamics?

Listen | 46:27

However, Catherine Ennis, chief legal officer and secretary of SMBC Aviation Capital, said in an affidavit that the plaintiffs were not prepared to afford additional time in circumstances where cover has been declined for similar claims. Litigation has been necessary both here and in other jurisdictions, she said.

In an application to have the case admitted to the High Court’s fast-track commercial list on Monday, Ms Ennis also said it was in the interest of all parties that the court determines quickly the meaning and effect of the war risks and all risks policies.

The firms are seeking orders and declarations including that the war risk insurers pay $1 billion under the policy and that the all risk insurers pay $1.75 billion.

Mr Justice Denis McDonald admitted the case to the Commercial Court, on consent between the parties, and said it could come back later this month when similar applications will be made by other aircraft leasing firms to have their cases dealt with in the fast-track list.

Those cases are by Avolon Aerospace (Hamilton) AOE 1 and associated companies and BOC Aviation (Ireland) and associated companies. Two other similar cases have also been brought by CDB Aviation Lease Finance DAC and associated companies and JetAir 1 Ltd and associated companies.

Four other similar cases are being brought in England and Wales and the USA.