Rayo Vallecano scored and The Final Countdown began. The last goal Barcelona conceded under Ronald Koeman was met by Europe booming round Vallecas.
"I made a mistake," Sergio Busquets said. "I slept and they robbed my wallet. It's my fault."
But on Wednesday it wasn't just him and he wasn't the one who paid. He had been caught out, Gerard Piqué was beaten, Jordi Alba absent and Lionel Messi in Paris. Radamel Falcao scored, someone hit play, 14,297 fans joined in, scarves twirling, and Rayo were on their way to victory. Koeman was just on his way.
Barcelona had not been beaten by Rayo in 19 years and had not been this bad since in La Liga in 34, not statistically. Defeated 1-0 by the smallest club in the Primera, this was their fourth away game: they have won none and scored one goal. They had lost twice in three days and five times this season, slipping to ninth.
Sitting in the tiny press room under the west end of the ground, Koeman was asked whether this might mean being sacked. “Don’t know,” he said, sounding like a man who did. If only because he has known for some time.
Everyone knew it was coming, just not necessarily now. The chronicle of a death foretold, the only thing anyone laments about Koeman's departure is that it was late. Sitting in the directors' box Joan Laporta, the president who considered his coach another inherited problem, had seen enough.
Barcelona left Vallecas and headed north to Barajas airport to fly home. Calls were made and by the time they landed it was done. The Dutchman had been told of the decision on board. It was exactly a year since the previous president, Josep Maria Bartomeu, had finally resigned.
The official announcement was made at 00.17 in Barcelona. The statement was short and cold and made no mention of his replacement. Koeman left the club's training ground at 01.18, with the intention of returning to say goodbye the following afternoon. Laporta had already headed off with the director of football, Mateu Alemany, and sporting vice-president, Rafael Yuste.
There was still a lot to be done and fast – they have two games in the next five days – but the first step had been taken. It had taken a long time and yet it had been hurried too, not planned.
Laporta was elected in March and his manifesto did not identify a manager of his own, his campaign built on one promise: to keep Messi. If the Copa del Rey win and Barcelona’s ability to get back into the title race drew them momentarily closer, the way they blew it, losing to Granada and drawing at Levante, pushed them further apart again. That loss, Laporta believed, was unacceptable and in the summer the president told his coach he was going to take a fortnight trying to find a replacement. If he could not, then Koeman could continue.
He could not. Laporta sought candidates in Germany but had neither the money nor the project to promise them and so on it went. And on, and on. Koeman was backed in the market insofar as Barcelona could do anything at all given their €1.35bn (£1.14bn) debts – Memphis Depay, Eric García and especially Luuk De Jong were players he wanted – but doubts never went away.
Untested manager
After defeat against Benfica in the Champions League, Laporta again tried to find an alternative, even briefing that a sacking was imminent, but again he failed.
Jordi Cruyff had encouraged him to be patient – not least because the club's international director didn't want to find himself forced to step in – yet more significant was the cost of replacing Koeman and the absence of an alternative. Now there is one. Xavi. Laporta's initial reluctance to turn to him, a young, untested manager who had been the key figure for his electoral rival, Víctor Font, has been overcome by circumstance too.
Koeman had always known circumstance kept him here, that this was a marriage of convenience and that Laporta had little love for him. Increasingly, he had said so publicly, the conflict out in the open.
“I have ears and eyes,” he had said, acutely aware he was being constantly undermined.
In a two minute 49 second statement, he had demanded backing “in word and deed”, and set again his position once more. In short, that he didn’t have much to work with.
Realism was a recurring theme, although it sounded a lot like an excuse and the pessimism didn’t help. When he asked: “What do you want us to do, play tiki tiki tiki taka?” not only was it incendiary, the answer was obvious: well, yes.
All of that opened greater faultlines.
“What I don’t like is a conformist attitude, a certain defeatism; that can’t be allowed at Barcelona,” Laporta said, but he would allow it, at least temporarily, because he did not have any alternative.
After defeat at Atlético, Koeman revealed the president had called him and backed him. They would move on together. An attempt was made to put up a united front. Club cameras showed them embracing at the training ground, all smiles. The tension was taken out of the press conferences.
“He deserves a margin of confidence,” Laporta said. “He’s very barcelonista.” Not: we like his work. Not: we know he will get this right. Not: we’re in this together. More: he scored at Wembley in 1992, remember?
Watching what was happening on the pitch, that limited confidence diminished daily, the hope they could cling on a little longer, that not too much damage would be done.
Koeman was proud of his willingness to bring kids through and his long-term legacy may well be revealed in Gavi, Nico, and Pedri. But the results were poor and, despite his protestations, so were performances. His recurring insistence Barcelona had played well did not convince; it made things worse, no sign he accepted responsibility or had identified their ills. If the problem wasn’t him – and his talk of realism is quite right, Barcelona’s decline is far deeper – nor was he the solution.
“It’s incredible that we lost this,” he said in Vallecas, but it wasn’t. Not that night or the previous nights either. Barcelona had missed a penalty, but it had been their only shot on target. And when Falcao scored, the final countdown began.
– Guardian
