Retained firefighters will resume their strike action next week after rejecting Labour Court proposals aimed at settling their dispute over pay and staffing levels by a margin of more than four to one.
Siptu had recommended rejection of the recommendations, which included large percentage increases to the annual retainers paid to the roughly 2,000 workers, increased staffing and rostering for more time off.
Minister for Housing and Local Government Darragh O’Brien had recommended acceptance, suggesting the agreement would be implemented ahead of the forthcoming talks on a new national public sector pay deal and would leave the firefighters significantly better-off.
The union’s members, however, ultimately voted against the proposals by a margin of 82 per cent to 18 per cent.
A Californian woman in Dublin: ‘Ireland’s not perfect, but I do think as a whole it is moving in the right direction’
Will Andy Farrell’s Lions sabbatical hurt Ireland’s Six Nations chances?
How does VAT in Ireland compare with countries across Europe? A guide to a contentious tax
Prof Donal O’ Shea: ‘The positioning of Ronald McDonald House at the entrance to the new children’s hospital makes me angry’
[ Firefighters face higher risk of dying from cancer, Ictu conference to hearOpens in new window ]
Divisional organiser Karan O Loughlin said although the headline figures in the proposal were large, the firefighters were starting from such a poor position that the deal did not deliver enough to represent a “first step to rebuild the retained fire service”.
“Stations all over the country are short-staffed with dangerously low levels of crewing on call-out. The Labour Court recommended the recruitment of an additional 400 firefighters but there are 350 vacancies as it is so that number would only actually represent 50 new positions across the country.
“The increases in the modest retainer given to these essential workers may look like something on a percentage basis but, in reality, they are a high percentage of a small amount and will do nothing to attract the numbers of firefighters that are required to address the issues.
“The proposals to address the retention problem are also inadequate as people are retiring on a mandatory basis or just leaving because the job is traumatic and stressful and not worth it because of the high levels of commitment and availability that are required. These problems are exacerbated by the fact that most of the income earned is precarious and not guaranteed.”
This was a reference to the fact that much of the firefighters’ income is based on call-outs, the number of which has been static in recent years and in decline over the longer term.
Ms O Loughlin said the industrial action undertaken in recent weeks had been suspended to allow for the Labour Court talks and then for its recommendations to be considered but that the action would now resume at about 200 stations across the country next Wednesday.
“There needs to be a moment of reflection here by both management (the Local Government Management Association) and the Government in relation to what is required to address this situation. As thigs stand, there are many firefighters who can’t afford to pay for their groceries, who can;’t pay their mortgages on what they are earning.”
