A hospital’s transfer of an anorexic patient to another medical setting in breach of a court order has been branded a “disgrace” by a High Court judge.
In a judgment published on Tuesday, Mr Justice David Nolan said there was a “fundamental systems break down” at the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital in Dublin, the responsibility for which “rests with the management of the hospital”.
The woman’s case had earlier come before the court’s “inherent jurisdiction” list as she was found to lack capacity due to anorexia nervosa. Orders made in this list are done to vindicate the constitutional rights of people who cannot make decisions in their interest due to a lack of capacity.
The judge said he some time ago made orders for the woman’s detention and treatment at the Mater after hearing her body mass index (BMI) was falling dramatically and that she was “very close to death”.
High levels of air pollutants that can cause respiratory, heart and brain issues found in Dublin hotspots
Leo Varadkar is right: basic maths should not flummox a minister or any of us
Dublin hotel bar manager accused of ‘defrauding customers’ by adding 10% service charge to bills
Soc Dems suspend Eoin Hayes for giving incorrect information about sale of shares from firm linked to Israeli military
The orders had been sought by the Mater, but it seems only one doctor was aware of their existence, the judge said. When that doctor went on leave for a week, the woman was assessed as medically stable and ready for a transfer to another medical setting.
The ensuing “illegal movement” has had a “detrimental” effect on the woman, as she became nervous and, “crucially”, her BMI level was affected, said the judge. “She deserves better,” he added.
The court discovered the move only after it had occurred. He said the situation is “quite frankly” a “disgrace”. He said he “foolishly” assumed that leading hospitals would have a system in place to communicate to doctors and nurses the legal status of their patients.
He noted the hospital has now put in place new safeguarding steps to ensure an event such as this does not happen again. He said steps such as putting a sticker on a folder would be “taken in a gym” and it is “shocking” that it has taken this case for the hospital to implement such a “simple basic procedure”.
He accepted an undertaking from the hospital’s chief executive officer ensuring that no breach of a court order will ever occur again in relation to someone who falls under the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
“If there is a breach of a court order, the next step would be an application for attachment and committal of the chief executive officer to explain why she is in contempt of court and/or an application for the sequestration of the hospital’s assets,” the judge said.
He said it is perhaps worthwhile reminding the medical community of the implication of orders made under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction.
Applications to this list are not “box-ticking exercises”, he said, but are “very serious constitutional applications to deprive somebody of their liberty for the specific purpose of vindicating their constitutional right to bodily integrity in circumstances where they themselves lack the capacity to make such decisions”.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis
