Court allows Microsoft Ireland to pursue €728,000 judgment against Saudi company

Judge lifts stay granted after 2015 $6m counterclaim against US technology giant

Case concerned company which had a retail agreement for the distribution of Microsoft products in Saudi Arabia. Photograph: PA Wire
Case concerned company which had a retail agreement for the distribution of Microsoft products in Saudi Arabia. Photograph: PA Wire

Microsoft Ireland Operations has been given the go ahead to pursue a US$829,000 (€728,000) judgment against a company which had a retail agreement for the distribution of Microsoft products in Saudi Arabia.

The High Court on Wednesday, lifted a stay on the judgment Microsoft obtained against Saudi-based Moneer Omar Thabit Trading Establishment in July 2015.

The stay had been granted because the defendant issued a counterclaim for $6 million against Microsoft, claiming it had failed to honour its promises in relation to the retail agreement. This included an agreement the defendant would become the sole distributor of certain Microsoft products in Saudi Arabia but this did not happen.

The stay on the judgment was to remain in place pending the outcome of the counterclaim.

READ SOME MORE

Mr Justice Seamus Noonan said he was satisfied to grant Microsoft's application to lift the stay because of what he previously described as "heel dragging" by the Thabit Trading Establishment side.

The defendant opposed the lifting of the stay arguing, among other things, a delay in exchanging expert reports from its side was due to its location in Saudi Arabia.

Mr Justice Noonan said the defendant’s report came from a Dublin based accountancy firm and it was difficult to see, in the modern era of instantaneous electronic communication, how geographical location can have any bearing on the delay.

Heel dragging

Since July last, when the judge wanted to see no further heel dragging, the defendant’s counterclaim had “not advanced to any significant degree but if anything, it might be said that it has reversed”, he said.

Given the timeline of the rate at which the defendant’s case had advanced since its inception five years ago, it seemed to the judge there was very little cause for optimism that the trial can take place at any time soon. None of the delays were the fault of Microsoft, he said.

It would be quite unjust to Microsoft to continue the stay. He noted that because of the laws of Saudi Arabia, Microsoft could not recover interest on the judgment sum.

Also, there was no suggestion that if the defendant’s counterclaim succeeds, it will not recover damages from Microsoft, which is a long established multinational conglomerate.