Aer Lingus and Ryanair get permission from High Court to challenge Dublin Airport passenger cap

Application to get stay on imposition adjourned until next Tuesday

Passengers at Dublin Airport. The High Court has granted permission to Aer Lingus, Ryanair and an association representing US airlines to bring challenges to a cap on passenger numbers at the airport for next summer. Photograph: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie
Passengers at Dublin Airport. The High Court has granted permission to Aer Lingus, Ryanair and an association representing US airlines to bring challenges to a cap on passenger numbers at the airport for next summer. Photograph: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie

The High Court has granted permission to Aer Lingus, Ryanair and an association representing US airlines to bring challenges to a cap on passenger numbers at Dublin Airport for next summer.

But Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty adjourned until Tuesday an application by the airlines to seek a stay on the imposition of the cap. Allocation of landing slots at the airport is due to take place on November 7th, the court heard. The judge was told it was inevitable also that there would be a reference on the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The challenges are against the Irish Aviation Authority’s (IAA’s) decision to limit Dublin Airport passenger numbers to 25.2 million for the summer 2025 season (late March to October next).

Separate challenges to a 14.4 million passenger limit over the 2024 winter period (from late October to March) is already subject to High Court challenges by Ryanair and Aer Lingus. The Dublin Airport Authority, which manages the airport, has also brought a challenge.

READ SOME MORE

Those judicial review proceedings are due to be heard in December.

The IAA is responsible for identifying and allocating an airport’s maximum available capacity in a fair and transparent way in line with EU regulation on slot capacity (the Slot Regulation) at EU airports. The body said it takes account of technical, operational, environmental and local planning constraints.

The US airlines representative association Airlines for America (A4A) is also bringing a separate challenge to the Ryanair and Aer Lingus cases.

‘Hospitality demand is there, but there is no margin anymore’

Listen | 39:50

Among the orders they are seeking is the quashing of the IAA decision to impose limits on the numbers of passengers and declarations that the IAA is not and was not entitled to have regard to planning conditions for both airport terminals when determining passenger limits under the Slots Regulation.

They also say there was a failure by the IAA to adhere to a requirement to discuss in detail its decision prior to making it with the co-ordination committee of airlines and the airport authority.

Aer Lingus also says the IAA acted outside its statutory powers and breached its rights under the Constitution and the European Convention and/or its legitimate expectations.

Ms Justice Gearty granted permission to Conor Quinn, for Aer Lingus, Martin Hayden SC, for Ryanair, and Declan McGrath SC, for A4A, to bring their proceedings on an ex parte (one side only represented) basis.

Mr Hayden said there was “inevitably going to be a reference” to the European courts for a ruling. He said Ryanair stood to lose some €50 million from the loss of 550,000 passenger seats and 3,000 slots.

Mr Quinn said Aer Lingus would lose 362,000 seats.

Mr McGrath, for A4A, said that with the slot allocation due to be made on November 7th, a decision on a stay needs to be made urgently. He also said it would be argued the passenger limit breaches the EU-US Open Skies agreement.

  • Sign up for the Business Today newsletter and get the latest business news and commentary in your inbox every weekday morning
  • Opt in to Business push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
  • Our Inside Business podcast is published weekly – Find the latest episode here