The “spotter” in a gang who gunned down veteran criminal Eamon Kelly over a decade ago has failed in a bid to overturn his murder conviction.
Darren Murphy’s lawyers had claimed that the process that identified him from CCTV was flawed and raised a Garda witness credibility issue.
In 2012, father-of-nine Kelly was shot four times in the back by a gunman as he walked towards his home on Dublin’s northside. He was one of the country’s most well-known crime figures, having been involved in organised crime for more than 40 years.
In November 2021 at the Special Criminal Court, Mr Justice Alexander Owens said the court found that Darren Murphy (53), of George’s Place, Dublin 1, who had denied the charge, was guilty of the murder of Kelly at Furry Park Road, Killester, Dublin 5, on December 4th, 2012.
Cutting off family members: ‘It had never occurred to me that you could grieve somebody who was still alive’
The bird-shaped obsession that drives James Crombie, one of Ireland’s best sports photographers
The Dublin riots, one year on: ‘I know what happened doesn’t represent Irish people’
‘I know what happened in that room’: the full story of the Conor McGregor case
The court found Murphy not guilty of possessing a Glock pistol with intent to endanger life on the same date and location due to insufficient evidence.
In January 2022, the three-judge court imposed a life sentence on Murphy, of George’s Place, Dublin 1, for his role as a “spotter” in murdering 65-year-old Kelly.
Murphy was involved in the murder as part of the common design of the murder gang, said Mr Justice Owens, when sentencing Murphy. “This involved him meeting with other members of the gang on the day of the murder. He acted in concert with them as the net closed in on Kelly and in co-ordination with them in the immediate aftermath of the shooting,” he said.
CCTV footage, he said, established that members of the gang were “scouting” in Killester in the afternoons leading up to and on the day of the murder.
In 2015, Seán Connolly, then aged 35, of Bernard Curtis House, Bluebell, Dublin, was jailed for life by the Special Criminal Court for Kelly’s murder.
At the Court of Appeal hearing, Paul Carroll SC, with James McCullough, argued that the case against his client, Murphy, “boiled down to the visual identification” by gardaí of Murphy from CCTV footage.
Mr Carroll had submitted that gardaí had prior knowledge of the date displayed on the footage shown to them related to the shooting and that some gardaí had looked up Murphy in connection with the shooting on the Garda Pulse information system before being shown CCTV.
Mr Carroll said the superintendent in the case had put in place a new process regarding recognition evidence whereby gardaí were summoned to Balbriggan Garda station in June 2018 without prior knowledge that the reason was to view CCTV.
Of those 58 gardaí, eight identified Murphy from CCTV walking his dog in the inner city, which then allowed officers to track Murphy’s movements throughout the day, including where he met up with others and travelled in convoy to Killester, where Kelly was murdered.
At the Court of Appeal today, Ms Justice Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, in dismissing the appeal, said “the [CCTV] process adopted were excellent in many respects”. She said the court was “satisfied that the members in charge of the exercise did not themselves know what the investigation in question was”.
The judge said individual gardaí conducted the identification process relating to the CCTV “in isolation” from other members and that the process had been recorded.
“It might be said that the failure of numerous gardaí to identify the appellant tends to support the conclusion that the process was not pre-loaded in some way that it would tilt a garda towards a positive identification,” said Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh. She said the presence of a stamp on the CCTV footage of the date of the murder did not “introduce an inherently unfair or prejudicial element into the recognition” as there was six years between the murder and the CCTV identification.
It had been argued by Murphy’s lawyers that gardaí who told the trial that they were not aware of any connection between the CCTV identification and the shooting “lacked credibility”.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said the Special Criminal Court had drawn a “clear distinction” between any knowledge some gardaí had of the shooting and their knowledge in 2018 — six years later.
The judge said the Court of Appeal was satisfied that the Garda witnesses had made “firm and untainted identifications”.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said the trial court was “well within” its remit in making findings of fact on credibility and identification and did engage with matters raised by the defence.
None of the findings of fact were “perverse such as the appellate court would be entitled to interfere with them”, she said.
It has been submitted by the appellant that the trial court had also erred in finding Murphy guilty by way of murder based on a joint enterprise because the evidence was “insufficient”.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said the appellant submitted that there was no evidence at the trial that Murphy had “realised or foresaw” that a murder was to take place or that he himself was of “murderous intent”. She said the trial court “set out in meticulous detail the individual items of circumstantial evidence” against Murphy.
“We agree entirely with the court’s conclusion that the evidence as a whole made it clear that this was not a spontaneous endeavour,” said the judge.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said Murphy was involved in careful planning, advance surveillance and practice runs, while his “spotting” was an exercise with others to place Kelly at the scene so he could be “ambushed”.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh then said the court would dismiss the appeal in its entirety.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Find The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Our In The News podcast is now published daily – Find the latest episode here